今早為Asian Medical Students Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK)的新一屆執行委員會就職典禮作致詞分享嘉賓,題目為「疫情中的健康不公平」。
感謝他們的熱情款待以及為整段致詞拍了影片。以下我附上致詞的英文原稿:
It's been my honor to be invited to give the closing remarks for the Inauguration Ceremony for the incoming executive committee of the Asian Medical Students' Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK) this morning. A video has been taken for the remarks I made regarding health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (big thanks to the student who withstood the soreness of her arm for holding the camera up for 15 minutes straight), and here's the transcript of the main body of the speech that goes with this video:
//The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to be rampant around the world since early 2020, resulting in more than 55 million cases and 1.3 million deaths worldwide as of today. (So no! It’s not a hoax for those conspiracy theorists out there!) A higher rate of incidence and deaths, as well as worse health-related quality of life have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, including people of lower socioeconomic position, older persons, migrants, ethnic minority and communities of color, etc. While epidemiologists and scientists around the world are dedicated in gathering scientific evidence on the specific causes and determinants of the health inequalities observed in different countries and regions, we can apply the Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework developed by the World Health Organization team led by the eminent Prof Sir Michael Marmot, world’s leading social epidemiologist, to understand and delineate these social determinants of health inequalities related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to this framework, social determinants of health can be largely categorized into two types – 1) the lower stream, intermediary determinants, and 2) the upper stream, structural and macro-environmental determinants. For the COVID-19 pandemic, we realized that the lower stream factors may include material circumstances, such as people’s living and working conditions. For instance, the nature of the occupations of these people of lower socioeconomic position tends to require them to travel outside to work, i.e., they cannot work from home, which is a luxury for people who can afford to do it. This lack of choice in the location of occupation may expose them to greater risk of infection through more transportation and interactions with strangers. We have also seen infection clusters among crowded places like elderly homes, public housing estates, and boarding houses for foreign domestic helpers. Moreover, these socially disadvantaged people tend to have lower financial and social capital – it can be observed that they were more likely to be deprived of personal protective equipment like face masks and hand sanitizers, especially during the earlier days of the pandemic. On the other hand, the upper stream, structural determinants of health may include policies related to public health, education, macroeconomics, social protection and welfare, as well as our governance… and last, but not least, our culture and values. If the socioeconomic and political contexts are not favorable to the socially disadvantaged, their health and well-being will be disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Therefore, if we, as a society, espouse to address and reduce the problem of health inequalities, social determinants of health cannot be overlooked in devising and designing any public health-related strategies, measures and policies.
Although a higher rate of incidence and deaths have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, especially in countries with severe COVID-19 outbreaks, this phenomenon seems to be less discussed and less covered by media in Hong Kong, where the disease incidence is relatively low when compared with other countries around the world. Before the resurgence of local cases in early July, local spread of COVID-19 was sporadic and most cases were imported. In the earlier days of the pandemic, most cases were primarily imported by travelers and return-students studying overseas, leading to a minor surge between mid-March and mid-April of 874 new cases. Most of these cases during Spring were people who could afford to travel and study abroad, and thus tended to be more well-off. Therefore, some would say the expected social gradient in health impact did not seem to exist in Hong Kong, but may I remind you that, it is only the case when we focus on COVID-19-specific incidence and mortality alone. But can we really deduce from this that COVID-19-related health inequality does not exist in Hong Kong? According to the Social Determinants of Health Framework mentioned earlier, the obvious answer is “No, of course not.” And here’s why…
In addition to the direct disease burden, the COVID-19 outbreak and its associated containment measures (such as economic lockdown, mandatory social distancing, and change of work arrangements) could have unequal wider socioeconomic impacts on the general population, especially in regions with pervasive existing social inequalities. Given the limited resources and capacity of the socioeconomically disadvantaged to respond to emergency and adverse events, their general health and well-being are likely to be unduly and inordinately affected by the abrupt changes in their daily economic and social conditions, like job loss and insecurity, brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and the corresponding containment and mitigation measures of which the main purpose was supposedly disease prevention and health protection at the first place. As such, focusing only on COVID-19 incidence or mortality as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities may leave out important aspects of life that contributes significantly to people’s health. Recently, my research team and I collaborated with Sir Michael Marmot in a Hong Kong study, and found that the poor people in Hong Kong fared worse in every aspects of life than their richer counterparts in terms of economic activity, personal protective equipment, personal hygiene practice, as well as well-being and health after the COVID-19 outbreak. We also found that part of the observed health inequality can be attributed to the pandemic and its related containment measures via people’s concerns over their own and their families’ livelihood and economic activity. In other words, health inequalities were contributed by the pandemic even in a city where incidence is relatively low through other social determinants of health that directly concerned the livelihood and economic activity of the people. So in this study, we confirmed that focusing only on the incident and death cases as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities is like a story half-told, and would severely truncate and distort the reality.
Truth be told, health inequality does not only appear after the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19, it is a pre-existing condition in countries and regions around the world, including Hong Kong. My research over the years have consistently shown that people in lower socioeconomic position tend to have worse physical and mental health status. Nevertheless, precisely because health inequality is nothing new, there are always voices in our society trying to dismiss the problem, arguing that it is only natural to have wealth inequality in any capitalistic society. However, in reckoning with health inequalities, we need to go beyond just figuring out the disparities or differences in health status between the poor and the rich, and we need to raise an ethically relevant question: are these inequalities, disparities and differences remediable? Can they be fixed? Can we do something about them? If they are remediable, and we can do something about them but we haven’t, then we’d say these inequalities are ultimately unjust and unfair. In other words, a society that prides itself in pursuing justice must, and I say must, strive to address and reduce these unfair health inequalities. Borrowing the words from famed sociologist Judith Butler, “the virus alone does not discriminate,” but “social and economic inequality will make sure that it does.” With COVID-19, we learn that it is not only the individuals who are sick, but our society. And it’s time we do something about it.
Thank you very much!//
Please join me in congratulating the incoming executive committee of AMSAHK and giving them the best wishes for their future endeavor!
Roger Chung, PhD
Assistant Professor, CUHK JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, @CUHK Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大學 - CUHK
Associate Director, CUHK Institute of Health Equity
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「physical culture中文」的推薦目錄:
physical culture中文 在 Charles Mok 莫乃光 Facebook 的精選貼文
【法政匯思就社會進一步動盪的聲明】
【Statement on Further Escalation of Social Unrest】
// 當體制構建不能保障市民應有的追索權,暴力兼「私了」必如落山流水跟著來,這已清晰可見。僅說無諾,何能「止暴制亂」?
// Where the system fails to provide proper recourse, vigilantism and violence proclaiming self-defence arise as simple cause and effect. Without any real commitment by the Government to de-escalate and defuse the political crisis, verbal condemnation and physical crackdown will do nothing to ‘stop violence and curb disorder’.
https://www.facebook.com/…/a.455221741311…/1474268236073377/
【法政匯思就社會進一步動盪的聲明】
【Statement on Further Escalation of Social Unrest】(Scroll for English)
1. 近日,警隊的行為就如國際特赦組織所言越見低劣。[1] 這皆因政府漠視其專家提供的建議,並以歇斯底里、毫無章法可言的策略回應持續的動盪。
2. 五個月來,政府持續容許以下情況發生,對警政問題及根本的政治危機藥石亂投:
a. 阻礙救護人員前往現場拯救傷者;[2]
b. 偏頗地處理強姦或酷刑對待被拘留人士的指控;[3]
c. 肆無忌憚地濫用武力;[4]
d. 以諸多藉口為警察的失控或報復行為辯解。[5]
3. 法政匯思強烈譴責警隊濫用武力,及其本末倒置、往往為社區添煩添亂的驅散示威者行動。警方在十一月十一日於香港中文大學(「中大」)、香港理工大學及香港大學等驅散非法集結及/或堵路行為的行動,指稱的事實根據惹人非議。[6] 在撰寫此聲明之時,警方甚至以催淚彈及橡膠子彈回應中大校長的善意,與學生發生激烈衝突,造成最少60人受傷及多人被捕。[7]
4. 歸根究底,現有的制度未能公正地調查涉及警務人員的刑事指控,乃是警民衝突的源頭。樂觀地看,這可能只是個別調查人員的疏忽;悲觀地看,這反映一種互相包庇的文化,可能已由員佐級警員到警務處處長、保安局局長甚至特首,滲透警隊及政府上下。無論是哪一個情況,這種警察橫行無忌的觀感已經令公眾對負責調查大部分罪行的警察的信任蕩然無存。這個缺口一開,刑事司法制度剩下非常有限的能力,處理失職警員。
5. 法政匯思繼續呼籲香港政府成立獨立調查委員會,調查包括六月份以來政府的治安管理手段。除了將肇事者繩之於法外,更重要的是全面檢閱香港警隊以達至結構上的改革。至今,特區政府對於這個明顯又實際的選擇不屑一顧,堅持讓一個缺乏監察權力的獨立監察警方處理投訴委員會(「監警會」)[8] 去調查警察投訴及內部調查科。這正正就是問題根源所在。
6. 監警會委派的國際專家組就這個問題發表《進展報告》。國際專家組與政府持相反意見。他們批評監警會在結構上欠缺全面調查權力,對監警會這一個輕型、監管式的體制是否能夠做出決定性的貢獻表示懷疑,更指出下一步的可能性諸如「委派一個享有所需權力的獨立調查機構以作更深程度及更廣泛的調查」,意味著一個獨立調查委員會。[9]
7. 對於近數星期暴力頻頻,政府沒有採取任何行動,只是堅拒示威者的訴求(包括成立獨立調查委員會),更稱他們為「人民的敵人」。[10] 警員們多月來非人化地濫稱示威者為「曱甴」。[11]
8. 法政匯思絕對不認同法外制裁。此立場於七月二十五日之聲明已表明。然而,當體制構建不能保障市民應有的追索權,暴力兼「私了」必如落山流水跟著來,這已清晰可見。僅說無諾,何能「止暴制亂」?
法政匯思
2019年11月15日
(PDF: https://tinyurl.com/tt2nzmr)
1. Police conduct has seen, in the words of Amnesty International, ‘another shocking low’ [1] in recent days as the Government ignored constructive feedback by its own experts and hysterically responded to the ongoing unrest without any rational strategy.
2. In particular, these allegations point to a wanton failure on the part of the Government to properly approach policing and the underlying political crisis, now in its 5th month:
a. Obstructing rescuers and ambulances from accessing the injured; [2]
b. Unfair handling of allegations of rape and torture in custody; [3]
c. Unapologetic excesses in its use of force; [4] and
d. Evasive defence of police officers acting impulsively or in retaliation. [5]
3. The Progressive Lawyers Group (the ‘PLG’) vehemently condemns the Police regarding their excessive use of force and dispersal operations which often create the chaos sought to be quelled. On 11 November, the police conducted operations in, amongst others, the Chinese University of Hong Kong (‘CUHK’), the Polytechnic University of Hong Kong and the University of Hong Kong to disperse unlawful assemblies and/or obstruction of traffic, [6] the factual basis of which has been doubted by many. As at the drafting of this Statement, as riot police responded to an olive branch by the CUHK Vice-Chancellor with tear gas and rubber bullets, severe clashes between students and riot police at CUHK are ongoing with at least 60 injured and dozens arrested. [7]
4. Nonetheless, the crux of the problem remains in the institutional failure to investigate criminal allegations involving police officers impartially. At best, it could be an omission by individual police officers in their execution of duty. At worst, it could be a culture that acquiesces and conceals wrongdoings affecting grassroot constables, the Commissioner of Police, the Secretary for Security and the Chief Executive alike. Whichever the case may be, this perception of impunity breaches the trust and confidence the public reposes in the police who are tasked with investigating most offences. With this link broken, there remains very limited recourse in the criminal justice system against rogue officers.
5. The PLG continues to call on the Hong Kong Government to appoint a Commission of Inquiry regarding, amongst others, the current approach to policing social unrest since June. Bringing wrongdoers to justice aside, the more important task is a holistic review on the Police Force and a roadmap to structural reforms. So far, the Government brushed aside this obvious and pragmatic option, insisting upon an inquiry by the Independent Police Complaints Council (‘IPCC’) [8] whose (lack of) oversight over the Complaints Against Police Office (‘CAPO’) is the very issue at the heart of the current saga.
6. Curiously, the International Expert Panel of the IPCC appointed for advice on that very inquiry seems to hold a contrary view. In their Position Statement Report of Progress, the experts pointed out ‘structural limitations in the scope and powers of the IPCC Inquiry’ and noted that ‘it remains to be seen whether a light touch, oversight body like the IPCC, can make sufficient progress to produce any decisive contribution…’ It also identified a possible next step such as ‘a deeper more comprehensive inquiry in a number of respects by an independent body with requisite powers’, alluding to a Commission of Inquiry. [9]
7. In response to the extraordinary brutalities these few weeks, the Government did nothing but maintain that it will not yield to the protesters’ demands (including an independent Commission of Inquiry) and call them ‘enemies of the people’. [10] It has not helped that the police have for months been blatantly using such a dehumanising term as ‘cockroaches’ to refer to protesters [11].
8. The PLG stands by our Statement on 25 July 2019 and does not encourage citizens to take justice into their own hands. However, it is obvious by now that where the system fails to provide proper recourse, vigilantism and violence proclaiming self-defence arise as simple cause and effect. Without any real commitment by the Government to de-escalate and defuse the political crisis, verbal condemnation and physical crackdown will do nothing to ‘stop violence and curb disorder’.
The Progressive Lawyers Group
15 November 2019
(PDF version: https://tinyurl.com/tt2nzmr)
physical culture中文 在 漂流出口 Outlet Drift Facebook 的精選貼文
明天又將毀滅自我,毀滅是終極之美
《當江山成為事實 藝改就是義務》江山藝改所成立一週年派對
《When Jiang Shan is a Fact, Yi Gai is a Duty》Jiang Shan Yi Gai Suo 1st Anniversary Party
時間 Time/
2014/05/17(六) 15:00 ~ 22:00
地點 Venue/
江山藝改所 (新竹市江山街17-4號/城隍廟旁/江山街13.15號巷縫中)
Jiang Shan Yi Gai Suo (No.17-4, Jiang Shan St., Hsinchu City/near Cheng Huang Temple/in the alley between No.13 & 15, Jiang Shan St.)
票價 Admission/
預售票 Advance $300 (發售至5/16 23:59前)
現場票 At Door $400
@ 購票方式 How to buy tickets:
1. 於本所營業時間現場購票 Pay cash at JSYGS during open time.
2. FB傳訊預約 Send a message to our Facebook page.
3. 來電預約 Call 03-5266456 during open time.
交通方式/
●大眾運輸
火車站出口出來,沿著左前方林森路直走約100公尺,於左手邊「台灣銀行」前搭乘大遠百免費接駁車,在第三個停靠站(中山路北門街口)下車,往前直走約50公尺右轉仁德街(地標為貢茶),直走約50公尺左轉江山街,找到13號及15號之間的防火巷,進入巷子約15公尺右手邊即為本空間正門。
●步行
火車站出口出來,沿著左前方林森路直走,看到右手邊的「南門醫院」後右轉復興路並直走東門街,看到城隍廟前廣場往正前方找到仁德街(地標為貢茶),進入仁德街直走約50公尺左轉江山街,找到13號及15號之間的防火巷,進入巷子約15公尺右手邊即為本空間正門。(約15~20分鐘)
●地圖 Map
中文版:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=418695844895096&set=a.418695798228434.1073741838.401184409979573&type=3&theater
English version:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=420338138064200&set=a.418695798228434.1073741838.401184409979573&type=3&theater
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
演出順序 Lineup/
15:00~15:50 Betty Apple 鄭宜蘋
16:00~16:50 再見!奈央! Goodbye Nao
17:00~17:50 理化兄弟 Physical Chemical Brother
18:00~18:50 漂流出口 Outlet Drift
19:00~19:50 黑狼/黃大旺龍捲風 Blackwolf Tornado
20:00~20:50 KbN 凱比鳥
21:00~22:00 Vice City + VJ Carl_Westman
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
表演者簡介 About The Performers/
Betty Apple 鄭宜蘋
1986年生於台灣嘉義,現於台北創作。身上流著聲音藝術家與電子樂創作者的新數位混種基因。受臥室電子樂與次文化影響甚深,往來舞曲與噪音之間毫無阻礙。台北藝術大學戲劇系主修表演,2008年畢業後開始使用個人電腦創作臥房電子樂,2010年進入台北藝術大學新媒體藝術研究所研究媒體藝術;作品內容多半為聲音與行為表演的現場藝術,探究身體操作聲音的新形態,擅長利用自身的身體語彙提出身體政治的精神意識形態。嘗試讓次文化精神與藝術思維混種的實驗。
曾跨界參與聲音藝術,電子樂表演,劇場音樂設計。為2012年電子樂推廣團體「耕聲人」主辦人之一,於當年九月促成台灣第一張以臥室電子樂反核人共同發起的「i love nuclear」的反核電音合輯,為台灣新生代聲音藝術搖籃的「失聲祭」2013年駐祭藝術家。更被國際前衛藝術雜誌「white fungus」多次邀請,與國際知名電子聲響藝術家Merzbow、EVOL、Zbigniew Karkowski、Scott Afford、王福瑞、Samin Son同台演出。
Betty Apple is a composer, DJ, and sound and performance artist. Apple has made an impact in Taipei with visceral noise/performance art pieces using synthesizers, field recordings and amplified vibrators. In 2013, Apple was the artist in residence at Lacking Sound Festival. In addition to her own performances, she curated a series of events exploring notions of sound in relation to femininity. Apple is at the forefront of a new wave of Taiwanese artists who are beginning to fuse their work with political activism. The anti-nuclear movement has grown exponentially in Taiwan over the past few years, in particular, since the meltdown at Fukushima, and Apple is among those who have organized events and produced music to support it.
http://www.bettyapple.com/
再見!奈央! Goodbye Nao
Goodbye!Nao!是一支不需要樂團簡介的樂隊
它在每個人心中都有不同具像 不斷被詮釋 解剖 試圖理解
表演起因 素材 精神或意義 無法歸類
他們所期待重視 僅是他們的姿態 能給觀眾的觸發
觀者 表演者 沉浸渾沌一氣的哲意場景
唯有踏入 才有機會透徹
非搖滾 後搖滾 工業噪音 行動聲響藝術 範籌
如鋼鐵 如流雲 如詩般的善意
全都 全都 回到自身感應衝擊
當然如果 你相信以上全都是放屁
那你大概也向他們靠攏了一點 (by babywhite)
「正如他們所聲明的,他們的音樂不過是無意識的囈語以及突如其來的悲傷」- Taipei Times
「後卡通手槍時代的樂團」-破報
「春天吶喊狀況多 樂手調音不順摔吉他」- 東森新聞
「為什麼你們的現場表演跟CD不一樣?」- 眾多友人
「我從來沒有聽懂再見奈央過,對,一次也沒有。」- freakeels(PTT 後搖滾版版主)
「Roo!」- 德州樂團The Octopus Project
「髒三樂團上海巡演,台灣樂團暖場,吉他手演出脫衣秀」- 東森新聞
「或许"傻逼"才是更合适他们的标签吧」、「我觉得他们实在是太烂了,烂到我搜肠刮肚也找不出任何正面的评论可以奉献给他们。」- 大陸網友
2005年10月 「再見!奈央!」首次在台北地下樂團最重要的舞台 THE WALL LIVE HOUSE 演出並受到PTT後現代搖滾版POST ROCK 版主的讚賞
2006年「再見!奈央!」成立首演之後即受邀參加台北市立美術館 <疆界>藝術展開幕-噪動之夜
Goodbye! Nao! needs no introduction. This band can be dissected and understood in many ways because how and what they play can’t be categorized. The only thing they anticipate is the energy and creativity they bring to the audience during performance.
網站:
http://www.indievox.com/goodbyenao
http://www.myspace.com/goodbyenao
理化兄弟 Physical Chemical Brother
獨立音樂圈版本:
電子皮、搖滾骨、數位魂 - 當8-BIT(8位元音樂)從遊戲中獨立出來,這已經不只是獨立音樂,更是獨立電子 - 翻玩古早任天堂電玩影像以及音樂的理化兄弟,將場景轉移到舞廳,創作風格橫跨Electro,Techno,Drum and bass,甚至到Dubstepush buttons。
狹義藝術圈版本:
當年差點組樂隊的無名氏兄弟,始終遙遙無期,於失散多年後在一場奇異的廟會相遇,各自吞了一顆濟公搓揉的腋下仙丹,各自幻化成DJ與VJ,理化兄弟於是誕生。目前的團員編制為創作型DJ :林昭宇 與半創作型VJ:黃真。目前有點專注於研究 8-bit 樂音,也稱為chiptune或是 Gameboy music。我們試圖運用現代科技來翻玩並探討當時曾經是頂風的影音技術,場域則從個人電玩機台到派對,再轉換進入表演空間進行與不同觀眾的對話。
Physical Chemical Brother sampling 8 bit sounds and graphic from Nintendo games, creating tracks who's style ranges from Electronic, Techno, DNB to Dubstep. Then places the mix on the dancefloor
where it becomes not just indie music but electro indie.
漂流出口 Outlet Drift
三位台東阿美族青年是來自比西里岸部落的碧海兄妹與都蘭部落的林肯。自父母親那一代許多族人為了生存來到了城市打拼,在文明社會的環境成長之下我們早已習慣了現代音樂與前衛音樂。因為興趣結識下我們一起玩音樂,模仿過很多影響自己的偉大藝術家。
對於環境和原住民族群的生活感受之下,尋找著自我的價值;不斷的徬徨、自省、振奮、墮落之下,對喜歡文學的巫尚,初期創作理念甚至出於唐代落魄詩人詩集。像是一句「冠蓋滿京華,斯人獨憔悴」的現象:雖然到我長大才認同自己的身分,但也很慶幸的回到家鄉看到了原住民本身非常特別的文化與音樂,也知道用我的感受來創造音樂的衝擊力。
發展出堅定的鼓聲,跳躍的低音,迷幻的吉他音效,現場像來到陰森的山林,雲霧繚繞,一位小男孩往前跑,在森林裡吶喊。這是朝著結合台灣原住民傳統小調,噪音民謠實驗樂隊,漂流出口。
Three aboriginal Taiwanese youths from Taitung jam together in the big city, united by their shared love of modern and avant-garde music.
Once lost in the value of life under influence of environment and being in a part of aboriginal groups, he’s finally found his identity in his culture through music and hoping to make an impact with his emotions through music.
Firm drums, bouncing bass and psychedelic guitar sound as if a little boy running and screaming in a creepy, foggy woods. This is a band blending traditional aboriginal Taiwanese tunes with experimental noises.
黑狼龍捲風(黃大旺) Blackwolf Tornado (Dawang Yingfan Huang)
「先天性表演者」黑狼(黃大旺)企圖延續表演生命的另一種挑戰。
It is yet another challenging attempt to continue the performing life of congenital artist Blackwolf Dawang Huang.
KbN 凱比鳥
以添加搖滾元素的實驗電子聲響著稱。成軍超過十年的他們,長期以來一直默默地為更多的聲音可能性,實現各種不同的創意發揮與改造。
Adding rock’n’roll elements to experimental electronic sounds in over ten years, they’ve been looking for and creating endless possibility of sounds.
專輯:
KbN - Before 2005 CD&DVD (2006)
19992005 (Orange Disk, 2013)
合輯 :
I Forgot Everything(2002)
蘿蔔一代 (小白兔唱片, 2003)
沈默的約定 (默契音樂, 2003)
2002貢寮海洋音樂季紀念專輯(角頭音樂, 2003)
FC5-118(台北之音, 2005)
Da Party(一瞬之光制作所, 2008)
The Message(Agnes b, 2010)
電擊夜市(Fun Music, 2011)
來做一張地下社會合輯(Underworld, 2012)
電影/短片配樂:
最好的時光(侯孝賢)2005坎城影展入圍
愛莉絲的鏡子(姚宏易)2005南特影展入圍
美人胚子(王梅蓉/駱巧梅)28屆金穗獎最佳劇情動畫
牛奶人(蘇話雅)31屆金穗獎最佳實驗片
漫畫配樂:
音速愛情(夏紹虞)2007
裝置:
Dance Floor@台北關渡美術館 2008
繪畫:
我們終於有一做島嶼(陳敬元)2010
網站:
http://kbn.tw/
http://soundcloud.com/funkbnice
http://k-b-n.blogspot.com/
http://www.myspace.com/funkbnice
Vice City
2009年開始舉辦派對,2010年起陸續與友人成立太初有舞、耕聲人、電音反核陣線等電子音樂文化推廣組織。
Vice City特別喜愛同時具有寬廣時間感、空間感,加上豐富身體感的音樂,有點像冥想、瑜珈,能夠帶來解放與覺知的神奇能量。
喜歡結合看似相互衝突的音樂元素,諸如大自然聲響、傳統部落樂器與吟唱、現代工業城市等都是她的靈感與採樣來源。
Vice City loves music that has broad sense of time and space, and rich physical sense that can bring liberation and magical energy of awareness that often comes with meditation or yoga. Any elements that seem conflicted such as natural sounds, traditional tribal music instruments and singing and modern industrial city are her sources of inspiration.
Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/vicecitybeats
FB: https://www.facebook.com/vicecity2013
VJ Carl Westman
長期旅居台灣的南非籍藝術家Carl Westman,創作遍及繪畫、平面設計、VJ影像、電子舞曲、噪音等形式,他的音樂就如同其視覺作品,在幾何線條與大量交疊的色彩中,既繁複又簡單,充滿了一股迷幻中帶著深邃黑暗的氛圍,反映他對生命、宇宙之意義與可能性的探索。
Long term resident of Taiwan, South African artist Carl Westman's type of creation includes painting, graphic design, VJ, electronic music and noise. Similar to his visual work by overlapping geometric shapes and colors, his music is both complex and simple in a deep and dark psychedelic atmosphere, reflecting his exploration in the meaning of life and universe.
網站:http://wooyapa.deviantart.com/prints/
FB: https://www.facebook.com/WooYapa