#立會去留 #RTHKLettertoHK
Participating in the upcoming extended term of the legislative council is, I feel, the lesser of two evils. Of course the one-year postponement of the election which should have been held this month was an anti-democratic trick by the government to avoid facing the voters. The extended term surely lacks legitimacy in the public eye.
But with liberal and democratic institutions being constantly undermined by an executive seeking to bring the other arms of government under its control, we must take every opportunity to voice our concerns, use every forum to fight back in the interests of Hong Kong’s governance, and the promises enshrined in the Basic Law.
Of course previously I’ve had my reservations about staying on, as it would mean accepting a quasi Beijing appointment in an un-elected legislature, ie without the people’s mandate. I’ve had my moments of a psychic tug-of-war.
It’s also understood that many of our young view some of the veterans in the democratic camp as washouts, that they belong to an earlier civilisation and should have been “outed” anyway. Some online criticism would go as far as, and I quote, “Can’t let go of the pay and the glory associated with a Legco seat, can you? Like you are being thrown a bone, a bone only but you can’t wait to go get it”, unquote.
Amongst the democrats I’m probably, probably, the one with the least
political baggage: The fact that I do not have a political party background; that I’m not young and as a result I wouldn’t need to worry too much about career development or prospects. And so perhaps I am more able to consider the “stay or quit” question with an even more free mind.
What’s happened is the number of pro-democracy legislators has already been thinned by legal manoeuvres to oust elected members. But we can perhaps muster just enough votes to deny the pro-government camp absolute control over the council.
Unrepresentative though it is, the council often is not just a talking shop and rubber stamp. It does have some ability to query officials, demand information and make constructive criticism of government proposals and policies. Even when the criticism is not particularly constructive, or some would even call it destructive, it could at least help vent public anger and frustration.
We need opposition voice to at least better health policy, labour rights, pollution, education and public transport problems.
Between now and next September we should be able to show Hongkongers that we can be of value in fighting for their interests. Although the system remains heavily weighted against us, the legislature remains a place where we can stand up, on the spot, against the arrogance and incompetence of the administration.
We don’t just make noise, we carry on to serve as the voice of the people. We shouldn’t become outsiders looking in. We need feet on the ground.
Sure we could be running into a storm without even an umbrella. Things could get painful. It’s so much easier to quit. But to quit would just be taking a placebo line. We cannot pretend the pain is not there, we just need to deal with it, fight it.
The lawmaker capacity does carry a degree of power. Once I called the agriculture and fisheries department, demanding to speak to the department head, saying it’s a matter of utter emergency. What was happening that day was a government wild pig hunting team armed with Remington's was scheduled to go to a village, provoking an unnecessary but possible violent standoff between villagers and animal rights campaigners.
My little intervention was successful. The AFCD head heeded and cancelled the hunting mission that day. And thanks to joint efforts on the civil society and Legco fronts such wild boar hunting squads have now been scrapped altogether.
Another episode that has been lodged in my head involved what happened on August 31 last year. Speculation was rife that there were fatalities inside the Prince Edward MTR station that evening, at the peak of our protest movement. I made a number of official enquiries and subsequently managed to have a face-to-face meet-up with the fire services chief.
Although in the end neither the police nor the fire department could satisfactorily explain the discrepancies in the number of injured and the state of injuries, at the time it was the only way to prompt —- if not force —- the civil servants involved to do their explaining in public, to the media.
It’s experiences of the kind that help to solidify my opinion that democrats should remain on the inside. Because of what we do, a lot of incompetence and hypocrisy, sometimes even some crookedness get exposed.
Beijing loyalists and the pro-government type would keep on politely tip-toeing around issues so as not to offend the authorities, they would keep on spinning mistruths, the democrats can counter that performance.
At a time when Hong Kong is politically, financially going down the tubes, with our young in particular feeling helpless, at a time when hope seems to be dismissed and punishment dealt, when discontent could morph into pure hate and antipathy to the government, democrats should help by not abandoning any battleline.
Anyone who wants to query government policies, draw attention to abuses, obtain information now faces increasing difficulties.
Assembly is restricted. People have to guard their words. Much mainstream media simply reflect official policies and journalists now have to be approved by the police to be treated as such. However inadequate it may be, the legislative council remains a forum for questions and comment, and is widely reported.
And popularly elected legislators in particular have standing which cannot be ignored at home, and they are also focus of foreign inquiry about Hong Kong issues. Journalistic institutions magnify the impact of such individuals who would otherwise find themselves crying in the wilderness, lone voices without a platform. Legco is a platform, however shaky.
If results of an opinion poll —-expected by Tuesday —-commissioned by the Democratic Party tell us to go —- easy, we’ll just pack up.
But Im hoping for the opposite. I for one would want to keep staying on the Legco frontline, standing up for what I believe. Nothing egotistical about it. We will simply take what's left and fight it out.
I’m prepared to take the lesser evil.
XXX
https://www.rthk.hk/radio/radio3/programme/lettertohongkong
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「against animal rights」的推薦目錄:
- 關於against animal rights 在 Claudia Mo/毛孟靜 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於against animal rights 在 短腿哥基男 陳麵包 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於against animal rights 在 葉天倫 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於against animal rights 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於against animal rights 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於against animal rights 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於against animal rights 在 Arguments Against Animal Rights by Jens Tuider at IARC2014 的評價
- 關於against animal rights 在 Animal Rights 的評價
against animal rights 在 短腿哥基男 陳麵包 Facebook 的精選貼文
#hkanimalrights
I hope this challenge can raise awareness over hk animal rights and prevent more animals from being harmed and injured. In Feb 2020, 30 animals were thrown from height and 18 of them died. Two suspects turned themselves to police, but Hong Kong department of justice declared yesterday that they will set the suspects free and the suspects won’t face prosecution for their actions.
This is a serious threat to Hong Kong animal rights. We should stand up and voice out our concern over the lack of justice and protection against animal cruelty in Hong Kong. They are lives and their lives matters.
To join this challenge, please tag your friends and post a b/w photo of your pet or any animals you like. We hope to show the society or even the world the importance of animal rights.
Now I challenge
哥基懵仔·懵事記
小霸王金多寶 Corgi Jackpot
長毛。噴泉尾 ε- 哥基 Gigi
#每日一post
against animal rights 在 葉天倫 Facebook 的最讚貼文
Joaquin Phoenix的舞台,可以說是世界最閃亮的舞台了。金球獎、好萊塢、奧斯卡.......他或許沒有政商領袖的高峰會議,但他的觀眾並沒有比較少。
當然他很幸運,不會因為在街頭激烈抗爭氣候變遷危機被警察逮捕就沒有戲演,他可以在金球獎上控訴白人主流世界的集體種族歧視,台下白人仍然給他熱烈掌聲。
就是因為有這樣的舞台與運氣,他很急切地要讓全世界知道:異性戀要透過法律或文化霸權干涉其他性向是不對的;不遵循傳統性別窠臼就要被處罰是不對的;因為天生膚色而有優越感是不對的;動輒用國家軍事力量威脅鎮壓小國是不對的;對地球上其他生物的廝殺宰制是不對的。
平等與正義是Joaquin Phoenix生命的信念,不論是揮舞性別平權的大旗、綁種族平等的布條、為酷兒人權或原住民或動物權發聲......他看到的都是反抗不公不義的美好人性。
Joaquin知道大家都害怕改變,害怕放棄原有的生活方式。但他不會高高在上地指責別人是抗拒改變的「既得利益者」,他反對圍剿對手取消按讚的網路群眾激情,他很熱切急迫地要大家知道,人類是有聰明才智,有創意有彈性可以為了拯救地球而改變自已的。因此不要恐懼多元成家、不要抗拒種族和平相處、不要害怕放棄吃肉。人類只要發揮各種天生的優勢,就能彼此扶持,就能停止殺戮、停止歧視、停止迫害。
照片圖說:從小吃素不使用動物製品(拒穿皮鞋皮衣)的 Joaquin 在奧斯卡頒獎典禮後與未婚妻一起吃的是洛杉磯全素漢堡店 Monty's Good Burger的全植物食材美食漢堡。
#Joaquin奧斯卡發言其中三段原文
“I think at times we feel or are made to feel that we champion different causes. But for me, I see commonality. I think, whether we’re talking about gender inequality or racism or queer rights or indigenous rights or animal rights, we’re talking about the fight against injustice.”
“We’re talking about the fight against the belief that one nation, one people, one race, one gender, one species, has the right to dominate, use and control another with impunity.”
“We fear the idea of personal change, because we think we need to sacrifice something; to give something up. But human beings at our best are so creative and inventive, and we can create, develop and implement systems of change that are beneficial to all sentient beings and the environment.”
Photo/ Greg Williams Photography
#Woke #素編 #奧斯卡 #vegan #Oscar
against animal rights 在 Animal Rights 的推薦與評價
On the other side, the arguments against granting animals a moral standing in the world begin with the lack of expression argument. Animals, the reasoning goes, ... ... <看更多>
against animal rights 在 Arguments Against Animal Rights by Jens Tuider at IARC2014 的推薦與評價
More about the conference: http://ar-conference.com/ ... <看更多>