Farewell. Ida – Ida Haendel 192?-2020
So Ida has left us – a legend has departed. What a violinist! What a woman! Magnificent, unique, incorrigible – she was a law unto herself.
First, the playing: a film about her was aptly entitled: ‘I AM the Violin.’ And she was! The violin was her life; she mastered it, devoted so much of her existence to it, cared so much about it. Every performance was an event, which she took absolutely seriously, giving each concert her all. She spoke through her violin, proved herself through it, lived within the music she made. She was a marvel, an icon; each note she played was the result of total conviction – and as a consequence was totally convincing. She had been groomed from the beginning to be a star – and a star she was.
But she was also an adorable person. I had heard of her, of course, from my childhood onwards – hadn’t everybody? But I didn’t meet her until - I think - 2000, when I attended a memorable recital she gave at the Wigmore Hall (apparently her debut there!), concluding with a magisterial performance of Enescu’s 3rd sonata. I’d heard, to my delight, that she’d heard me somewhere, and had liked it, so I dared to go backstage afterwards. Having enthused about her playing, I rather uncertainly told her that I was Steven. She looked at me disbelievingly. ‘You’re NOT’ she announced, in her wonderful deep voice. I assured her that I certainly had been last time I looked in the mirror. She accepted this, and proposed that we play the Brahms Double together. It was such an honour; but alas, I just couldn’t do the dates she suggested.
I came across her shortly thereafter, however, at the Verbier Festival. I’d seen that she was giving masterclasses there, so when I saw her, I asked how they were going. She looked at me severely. ‘Steven,’ she boomed, wagging her finger. ‘I don’t teach.’ I was puzzled; she was, after all, advertised as the teacher of the violin class. ‘So you like teaching?’ I said, provoking her. The finger wagged again. ‘Steven,’ she repeated with equal seriousness, ‘I don’t teach.’ ‘So how’s the teaching going?’ I asked. Her finger was on its way in my direction, and she’d started to say my name in the same tone of voice – when suddenly her face broke into a big smile. ‘Oh – so you’re a tease,’ she said. After that, we got on famously. My other main memory of that Verbier encounter was of her examining something – I couldn’t see what - in the hotel lobby, and then calling me over. It turned out that the object in her hands was an album of recent photos of her. ‘Look, Steven,’ she commanded urgently. ‘Don’t I look gorgeous?’
Later, we took her to dinner near her flat in London. Tottering through the streets in her high heels, she suddenly came to a stop in front of a (closed) clothes shop, where either a pair of gold shoes or a gold dress (I can’t remember which) had caught her eye. It was impossible to budge her, late though we were for the restaurant. ‘Wouldn’t I look wonderful in that?’ she asked us challengingly. We agreed that she would. ‘I’m coming back here tomorrow morning,’ she assured us. She spoke that night about her appearance. ‘You think I dress like this just to go out?’ she asked. ‘No! Catch me at breakfast – I’ll look just the same.’ Her pride in her appearance was never-changing. Perhaps in someone else it could have been too much – but with Ida, it was wonderful, admirable; life-affirming, in fact, like her pride in her playing.
It is funny that already I’ve seen two obituaries giving her age five years apart. She’d certainly have preferred the younger estimate… It was impossible to get the truth out of her. I remember asking another glorious violinist-character, Lorand Fenyves, whether he knew Ida. ‘Oh yes, of course!’ he replied. ‘I knew her when I was 16 and she was 15.’ He paused. ‘And now I’m 80 and’ his eyes twinkled, ‘she’s 55!’
Although we never got to play the Brahms Double together, we did perform the Beethoven Triple concerto with Martha Argerich and the Rotterdam Philharmonic under the then little-known Yannick Nezet-Seguin in (I think) 2006. Now THAT was an experience – to put it rather mildly… Playing with those two way-larger-than-life ladies was something not to be forgotten; the two adored each other, and it was great fun to witness their interaction. Ida had only played the piece once before, as I remember; but she played it with utter conviction. And Martha was – well, Martha. And Yannick kept the whole thing together, somehow. So – it was special…
It was supposed to happen again, in Miami (where Ida lived); but alas, it didn’t. Still, I kept in touch with Ida and on one memorable occasion got to interview her at the Wigmore Hall (there’s a recording of that occasion on Youtube). She also came down to Prussia Cove once for three days, her visit culminating in a breathtaking account of the Bach Chaconne (she sported an almost equally breathtaking dress to match!) at the Hall for Cornwall. We also played and taught/didn’t teach together in 2010 at the Summit Music Festival, just outside New York. That was another unforgettable experience. At the concert that concluded the festival, Ida played virtuoso pieces with the orchestra that would have been impressive in someone thirty years younger – even younger – than she was. But equally Ida-ish was the post-concert experience. For some reason, it got very late, and it was well after midnight when we were taken in search of food. Not surprisingly, there were few options in the countryside at that time of night; but eventually we found a 24-hour diner. We went in and occupied a table. Looking around at the bikers and other rather unpredictable-looking types, I was a tad nervous; not Ida. I fortified myself with a margarita; she had tea. At one point, the conversation turned to Schumann, and his 2nd violin sonata (which at that time I didn’t know very well). I asked a question about it. ‘You want to hear how it goes?’ Ida demanded to know. She strode over to her violin-case, pulled out the violin, and to the astonishment (and then, luckily the delight) of the assembled company, began to play it. A photo taken at the time (below) shows me a little less than comfortable – and her absolutely in her element.
Oh, Ida. By the last time I spoke to her – too long ago, but not that long ago – I’d heard that she’d become very forgetful, so wasn’t quite sure whether to call her or not. But I dialled anyway, and the phone was answered. ‘Hello, Ida?” ‘Who is it?’ ‘It’s Steven – Steven Isserlis.” Silence – then the phone went dead. Oh dear. I tried again. This time I was able to hold her attention long enough to remind her who I was. We started to talk, and as the conversation progressed, she evidently remembered more and more about our friendship. It was true that she repeated herself a lot; but still – she was very much Ida, the same wonderful voice, the same love of life.
And now she’s gone. Farewell, Ida the legend; we humanoids will miss you – but thank you, thank you for giving us so much. Everything, in fact.
finger point icon 在 Roundfinger Facebook 的最佳貼文
เหตุผลที่คนควรยืดเส้น
Stretch Me
---
1
เพื่อนๆ พี่ๆ ยืดเส้นกันบ้างไหมครับ, สำหรับผมแล้ว ในชีวิตประจำวัน ผมแทบไม่มีการยืดเส้นยืดสายเลย จะทำก็ตอนก่อนและหลังออกกำลังกายเท่านั้น ช่วงนี้วิ่งเยอะก็เลยได้ยืดบ่อยหน่อย ช่วงที่ไม่วิ่งก็จะรู้สึกเมื่อย ตึงๆและเครียดแบบงงๆ ไม่ทราบสาเหตุ คล้ายมีใครมาขี่คอ (ฮ่าฮ่า)
2
การยืดเส้นนี่ที่จริงไม่ได้จำเป็นเฉพาะคนออกกำลังกายเท่านั้น คนไม่ออกกำลังกายนี่แหละยิ่งควรยืดเลยครับ เพราะถ้าไม่ยืดเลย กล้ามเนื้อต่างๆ จะแข็งเกร็งเป็นก้อน นำมาซึ่งความเครียดโดยไม่รู้ตัว มากเข้าก็อาจนำไปสู่อาการเจ็บปวดจำพวกออฟฟิศซินโดรม ส่วนนักกีฬาทั้งหลาย ถ้าออกกำลังกายหนักก็น่าจะต้องยืดหนักตามไปด้วย
3
ต่อจากนี้เป็นโฆษณาที่เต็มใจแนะนำ เพราะไปลองแล้วชอบมากครับ หลังจบมาราธอนล่าสุดที่บางแสน บังเอิญผมได้รับคำชวนให้ไปลองใช้บริการยืดเหยียดเพื่อคลายกล้ามเนื้อที่ Stretch me by Let's Relax ที่เซ็นทรัลเวิลด์ ลองแล้วชอบขอนำมาบอกเล่าเผื่อใครอยากไปลองบ้าง
4
บริการที่ผมได้ลองคือการยืดเหยียดในคอร์สสำหรับคนออกกำลังกาย ซึ่งจะเน้นไปที่ขา ต่างจากคอร์สสำหรับคนทำงานออฟฟิศ ซึ่งจะเน้นไปที่คอ บ่า ไหล่ สิ่งที่แตกต่างไปจากการนวดแผนโบราณหรือนวดน้ำมันก็คือ คนให้บริการที่นี่นั้นเป็นนักกายภาพบำบัดทั้งหมด ฉะนั้นจึงไม่เน้นที่การนวดเฟ้นหรือรีดเส้น แต่เน้นที่การยืดเหยียด หมุน เขย่า ให้กล้ามเนื้อผ่อนคลาย นักกายภาพบำบัดจะรู้จักสรีระไลน์ของกล้ามเนื้อทั้งร่างกายที่เชื่อมต่อกัน ทำให้การยืดกล้ามเนื้อเป็นไปอย่างตรงจุด
5
การยืดเหยียดโดยนักกายภาพให้ความรู้สึกแตกต่างจากการนวดแผนไทย อย่างแรกคือไม่ระบม ไม่เจ็บจากท่ายาก อีกอย่างคือการไม่บดขยี้ที่กล้ามเนื้อนั้นกลับช่วย "คลาย" ได้มากกว่าย้ำลงไป นักกายภาพหมุนหัวไหล่ ขา เข่า ของเราไปมา แต่สร้างความรู้สึกผ่อนคลายได้ หลายๆ ท่าทำให้รู้เลยว่ามีบางจุดที่เราไม่เคยยืดเหยียดมันมาก่อนเลย ปล่อยไปนานๆ อาจติดๆ ขัดๆ เมื่อแก่ตัวลง
6
หากใครเคยเข้าฟิตเนส แล้วมีเทรนเนอร์ยืดเส้นให้ตอนเริ่มและจบ ก็จะคล้ายกัน แต่คอร์สที่นี่ก็จะเต็มรูปแบบกว่า เพราะให้ใช้เวลา 60นาที 90 นาที และ 120 นาที แล้วแต่ความตึงของแต่ละคน เลือกได้เลย ผมแอบสังเกตลูกค้าที่ไปนอนนวดก็เคลิ้มหลับกันหลายคน คนข้างๆ ที่แอบได้ยินเสียงกรนเบาๆ คงจะสบายมาก
7
สถานที่ดีไซน์สวยทันสมัย น่าจะถูกใจนักกีฬาและคนทำงาน เรียบง่าย สะอาดสะอ้าน โมเดิร์น และเงียบสงบ เหมาะแก่การพักผ่อน นับเป็น 60 นาทีที่ดีงาม ยังไม่อยากให้จบเลยจริงๆ
8
จากประสบการณ์ที่ได้ลอง ก่อนเดินเข้าไปขาสองข้างนี่ตึงอย่างหนักเพราะเพิ่งผ่านมาราธอนมา เดินออกมารู้สึกขาเบาขึ้นมาก ซึ่งไม่แปลก นี่คือวิธีดูแลร่างกายแบบเดียวกับที่นักกีฬามืออาชีพทำกัน คือพอซ้อมหรือลงสนามหนักๆ มาก็จะให้นักกายภาพดูแลแบบนี้แหละ ผมว่าคนที่ใช้บริการในคอร์สของคนทำงานหรือนักเดินทางก็น่าจะฟินพอกัน ฟังจากเสียงกรน ฮ่าฮ่า
9
ถ้าสนใจก็ไปลองกันได้ครับ มีหลายราคาให้เลือกกัน ตอนนี้มีสองสาขาคือ ที่เซ็นทรัลเวิลด์ ชั้น 3 Forum Zone (โซนฟิตเนส) และ Icon Siam ซึ่งจะเปิดตัวในวันที่ 10 พ.ย.นี้
10
ทาง Stretch me by Let's Relax ใจดี ฝากของรางวัลมาแจกให้กับเพื่อนๆ พี่ๆ ในเพจนิ้วกลมด้วยครับ เป็น Voucher ใช้บริการฟรี แบบนักกีฬาและพนักงานออฟฟิศ อย่างละสามใบ ผมเสนอกติกาง่ายๆ แบบนี้แล้วกันครับ ฝากแชร์สเตตัสนี้ไป (อย่าลืมเปิดพับลิกนะครับ) แล้วเขียนเหตุผลสั้นๆ ว่า "คุณคิดว่าการยืดเหยียดเพื่อผ่อนคลายกล้ามเนื้อนั้นสำคัญยังไง" ผมจะสุ่มเลือกผู้โชคดีทั้งหกท่าน แล้วแจ้งให้ทราบนะครับ
#advertorial
The reason why people should stretch
@[641625236210940:274:Stretch Me]
---
1
Friends, do you want to stretch? For me, I almost have no stretch. I will do it before and after working out a lot of running a lot. I have been stretching. When I don't run, I feel tired. And I'm confused. I don't know why someone is riding in the neck (haha)
2
Stretching is not necessary. Only those who don't exercise. People who don't exercise should stretch it. Because if you don't stretch it, the muscles will be strong. It will bring stress without knowing. It may lead to the pain in the office syndrome. All athletes, if you exercise hard, you should have to stretch hard. Follow.
3
From now on, I'm willing to recommend because I have tried it very much. After the end of the marathon at Bangsaen, I have been invited to try the stretch service to relieve muscle at Stretch me by Let's Relax at Central World. I like to tell you if anyone wants to try.
4
The service that I have tried is a stretch in the course for the exercise, which will focus on the legs. Different for office workers, which will focus on the neck and shoulder. What is different from traditional massage or oil massage is a person. Serving here is all physical therapists, so it doesn't focus on massages or ironing, but focus on stretching, rotating, relaxing. Physical therapists will know the body line of the body. It makes it makes the stretch of muscles. On point
5
Stretching by physical people feel different from Thai traditional massage. First thing is no pain, no pain from difficult posture. Besides, it doesn't crush the muscles can help "relieve" more than repeat, the physical, the physical, legs, legs, legs, knees. I have been there, but I can feel relaxed. I know that there are some point we have never stretched before. Let go for a long time. It may be in a row when I get older.
6
If anyone has been into fitness, there is a trainer to stretch when start and finish. It will be similar. But the course will be more full because it takes 60 minutes, 90 minutes and 120 minutes. It's up to the tightness of. Each person can choose. I secretly notice the customer who goes to bed and massage. Many people next to me who secretly hear a little snoring. It would be very comfortable.
7
Beautiful design, modern design. It should be like athletes and simple, clean, modern and quiet. Perfect for relaxing. It's a good 60 minutes. I don't want to finish.
8
From the experience that I have tried before walking into two legs. This is very tight because I just passed. Rathon came out. I feel much lighter legs. This is not strange. This is how to take care of the same way that professional athletes do. It's enough to practice or on the field I want to take care of this. I think those who use the course of working or travelers should be satisfied. Ha snoring. Haha.
9
If you are interested, let's try. There are many prices to choose from. Now there are two branches at Central World, Forum Zone (Fitness Zone) and Icon Siam which will be launched on 10 Nov. Oh, my God. Here we go.
10
Stretch me by Let's relax. Please give away to friends on the round finger page. It's a free service for three athletes and office staff. I offer simple rules like this. Please share the status. These cuddle (don't forget to open the folding) and write a short reason "how important do you think stretching to relax" I will choose all six lucky people and let me know.
#advertorialTranslated
finger point icon 在 喬靖夫 Facebook 的最佳貼文
【A.I. FOREVER】在Youtube看到的一篇很長的comment,寫得非常詳細,從數據上比較其他偉大球星,檢視Iverson的職業生涯表現,給予他更公正的評價。
(by sportsmed77)
[+Kareem Elwakil Those other posters shouldn't have insulted you to make their points, but I think your arguments are extremely weak. The only thing you bring up is that AI's career FG% was 42% and that he jacked up "30 shots" to get his points. His FG% was technically 42.5% for his career (Tracy McGrady's was 43% and Kobe Bryant's was 45%, which really isn't that much higher relatively speaking by the way) and a lot of AI's missed shots had to do with the team he was playing on and how their offense was structured, his role on the team as the only scorer, etc. but I won't get into that. AI averaged about 21 shots per game for his career, by the way. Hardly the 30 shots per game you tried to give him credit for. AI led the NBA in scoring 4 times, and out of those for times, only twice did he also lead the league in field goal attempts (and not by much - plus he averaged more free throws than everyone else) so the argument that "if anyone shot as much as AI did, they would score as much too" clearly is not the case. In his prime, Tracy McGrady averaged about 23 shots per game, Kobe Bryant also about 23 shots per game, and AI also about 23 shots per game. AI, Kobe, and Jordan all had a season where they shot the ball 27 times per game. Per 36 minutes, AI only averaged 19 shots per game for his career (keep in mind, AI played more minutes than anyone else each game during his era). Michael Jordan averaged 23 shots per game for his entire career. For his career, Jerry West averaged 20 shots per game and in his prime, it was about 22 shots per game. Before Lebron James got there, Dwayne Wade was averaging between 20 and 22 shots per game for a few seasons because he was the go-to option. You know what all of these players have in common with AI? They were all SHOOTING GUARDS and the go-to option! They were supposed to shoot! Some SGs are volume shooters who slash and get to the free throw line. Some of them have lower FG% but still are productive for their teams. Other SGs have a higher efficiency, but a player's FG% really depends on a number of factors you haven't even taken into consideration.
To reiterate this point, for most of AI's career, he was a SHOOTING GUARD. I hate when people compare him to point guards and then act like he was worse than them because he didn't play like a PG. It is ridiculous because it is like comparing apples with oranges. By the way, you brought up Jason Kidd and how he was so much "better" than AI. Did you know Jason Kidd's career FG% is 40%? He had 10 seasons where he shot below 40% for the season. AI only shot below 40% for 1.5 seasons and his career FG% is higher than J-Kidd's. J-Kidd averaged 12 PPG for his career and only 2.8 free throw attempts. AI averages about 27 PPG for his career. So just as you can say J-Kidd was a way better passer than AI, I can say AI was a way better scorer than J-Kidd. They had different roles and they excelled in their roles. Jason's job was to pass, and AI's job was to create shots.
It is a myth that AI was not a good passer. AI averaged 6.2 assists per game for his career. That is good for a SG - more than Kobe, more than MJ, more than Vince Carter, more than Tracy McGrady, more than Wade, etc. AI had about 5 or 6 seasons where he averaged between 7 and 8 assists per game while still scoring 26+ points. It is impressive. He had an entire season where he averaged 33 PPG and 7.4 APG with 2 steals on 45% shooting and a TS% of over 54%, and people like you try to say he was just "okay at best"? AI had a unique style, especially for his size and was probably one of the top 5 most exciting players to watch. To say he was not "that good" shows that you likely saw very few AI games. I would say AI is a top 20-30 player all-time. Anyone who actually saw, for example, his 2001 play-offs and regular season run, would know that he was amazing and did so much for that team and if someone looks at the stat box, they will not get the actual story. You had to have seen the games with your own eyes. With AI, stats have always been misleading. I also want to point out that AI's True Shooting % (TS%) is slightly higher than Isiah "Zeke" Thomas and is pretty decent (at about 52%). He had a couple of seasons in Denver where his TS% was almost 57%. TS% is a much more accurate depiction of someone's accuracy when shooting. You know why? Because it takes into account free throws among other factors. AI is one of the greatest players of all-time at getting to the free throw line, and unlike Lebron James and many others, he didn't flop to do it. He was legitimately fouled, hurt, and referees even admitted to conspiring against him and purposely not calling fouls on players who fouled him when they should have. Yet AI is still 10th all-time in free throws made. He was a slashing, fearless guard with incredible talent and an ability to create shots for himself that very few other players have been able to do. His style of play is more comparable to Kobe Bryant or Tracy McGrady (Kobe had a better career, but in AI's prime there were seasons where they were almost equally good). Yet he is 160 lbs. soaking wet so he is an anomoly because small players aren't supposed to be able to do what he does. The two years AI's shooting percentage was the lowest in Philly, he had just come off of a serious elbow surgery (2001-2002) and had played with a broken hand another season. You put so much emphasis on his accuracy those seasons, but what about his heart? How many players would play with the injuries he had? I guarantee you not many. Even while in Denver, Carmelo said AI was playing with a broken finger the entire season. In the 2001 play-offs by the end of the 2nd round, AI had 7 injuries (serious elbow bursitis, knee bursitis, dislocated shoulder, sprained thumb, hip pointer, bruised tailbown, and twisted ankle). Yet he played, and he played his heart out contributing to his team in other ways even when he couldn't find his shooting rhythm due to the pain he was in. I watched every game he played in back then (even taped them so I could immitate some of his moves since I played ball). I would know.
I am definitely convinced that anyone who claims Iverson was an "extremely poor shooter" either did not watch him play or knows a lot less about basketball than they think they know. AI was not a poor shooter. He took incredibly difficult shots - often times while double and triple teamed, and given that he was smaller than everyone else, it is incredible that he still made some of them. He was a shot creator. He was immensely creative. Larry Brown even used to sit on the sidelines and call out to AI to shoot the ball more and create shots. Even George Karl in Denver once told AI to shoot the ball more, stop being so UNSELFISH, and take over games the way he used to in Philly. Unfortunately the media doesn't like to talk about that. Not one of AI's teammates thought he was selfish. I have seen very few players who are as loved and respected by his former teammates and former peers as AI. The amount of love he gets from everyone from Dr. J, Maurice Cheeks, Moses Malone, Kobe Bryant, Lebron James, Dwayne Wade, Carmelo Anthony, Aaron McKie, Eric Snow, Theo Ratliff, Dikembe Mutombo, Chris Webber, Kyle Korver, Chris Paul, James Harden, Larry Brown, Paul Pierce, John Thompson, Andre Iguodala, Larry Hughes, Bill Walton, Rip Hamilton, Rasheed Wallace, Shawn Marion, Steve Nash, Dirk Nowitzki, Shaquille O'Neal, etc. etc. etc. I can go on and on. Many of these very players have called AI "pound for pound the greatest." I have seen very few players get so much love and adoration by their peers. I was at AI's jersey retirement and heard what so many players around the league past and present had to say about him and it was just insane. I also have never heard one of AI's former teammates call him a bad teammate. They loved him and loved playing with him. It is the media that tries to paint that picture, but his peers and former teammates paint a completely different picture.
What the media says is a myth. AI's former coaches and teammates and peers adore him. In 2001, AI had the most first place MVP votes in history (tied with Shaq) and became the smallest player to ever win the MVP award. You think he is overrated? I guarantee you the people who vote on MVP, the players, the coaching staff, etc. know far more about AI's contributions to the sport, how good he was, etc. than you do. He deserves what he got. Every accomplishment he achieved, he did it despite immense adversity. He is 7th All-Time in PPG, 4th All-Time in Minutes Played, 7th All-time in Steals, won 1st Team All-NBA multiple times... this man played with so much heart and believed in himself so much that you had to believe in him. This man is up there with MJ, Kobe, Wilt, and players of that caliber for most 40 and 50 point games in his career. I hate when people try to take away from his accomplishments rather than appreciating him for what he accomplished at his size and what he brought to the game. He is the reason I played basketball at all. He gave little people hope. He is a cultural icon. I really wish people would stop with the "AI is overrated" nonsense. If your peers think that highly of you to call you "pound for pound the greatest," then obviously you did something right. ]
#alleniverson #theanswer #ai3 #onlythestrongsurvive #sixers #76ers #bubbachuck #basketballneverstops